Quality over quantity, folks.
The game of this week has, without a doubt, been Stray. The cyberpunk adventure game about a cat in a world of robots has been winning hearts and minds over, and people haven’t stopped talking about it all week.
But the game has caused one other line of discourse to re-emerge. The age-old argument that somehow a “short” game isn’t worth the money and that the amount of “content” you get in a game determines its value.
In this video, we challenge that idea (Also, check out our review!).
First and foremost, Dragon Age: The Veilguard isn’t a Dragon Age game. It doesn’t look like…
Past collaborations between Eastasiasoft and Idea Factory have been quite good. There are many in recent…
Writing horror is a tough gig. It’s challenging for writers to create and maintain fear and…
Welcome to Digitally Downloaded’s weekly catch-up news feature, the catch-up coffee. I will bring you the…
Crayon Shin Chan has been around since 1990, and I’ve been aware of his existence for…
Session expired
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.
I prefer short games. If you recommend something to me that’s 50+ hours you’ll have a long time convincing me.
Any game can become a short game if you simply quit once you get bored. Endings are overrated anyway.
I read somewhere, many (many) years ago that humans are hard-wired to seek out a conclusion to things they witness, and there can be a subtle anxiety involved in, for example, having a song that you’re listening to cut off half-way through.
Whatever the science and psychology behind that was, I long ago overcame it when it comes to video games <_<.